Larry Barsalou, the influencer

When you are as thoughtful, intellectually curious, and gracious as Larry Barsalou is, you can inspire others without even knowing it. While I have never been lucky enough to work with Larry closely as a mentee or a colleague, my career would not be what it is today without his personal influence.

To understand Larry’s impact on me, I need to give some background. In the 1990s, I was a philosophy and linguistics graduate student at the University of Chicago, where Larry was a faculty member. While in graduate school, I had a close friend, Jesse Prinz, who was younger, hipper, and smarter than I was. Jesse started going to classes and seminars taught by Larry, and I tagged along – not realizing the delayed effect that they would eventually have on me. I seriously doubt that Larry remembers me from this time. After all, I was not in his department, I was working on a topic that was unrelated to his research interests (our biological endowment for language), and I wasn’t contributing much to class discussion.

Jesse would go on to work with Larry directly. He would write a dissertation that would become his first book, “Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis.” He and Larry would also write a couple of well-cited book chapters together.

In the last stages of graduate school, I moved from Chicago to Louisville to be the primary caregiver of my daughter while my wife went through medical school and residency. Eventually, I served as a post-doctoral fellow in a developmental neuropsychology lab at the University of Louisville. Working on various projects in the lab, I became interested in research on imageability and concreteness effects. Thinking back to those classes in graduate school, I recognized that abstract concepts provided an important challenge to grounded cognition in general and Larry’s perceptual symbol system theory in specific. I wrote up my concerns in a long piece that I submitted (against the very reasonable advice of my colleagues) to a prominent journal. I received two constructive but challenging reviews. One was signed by Larry. After two difficult rounds of revision, the manuscript was accepted.

Like many academics, my early career was tenuous. It is not an exaggeration to say that I might not be in academia now if it were not for Larry’s guidance on a manuscript that was somewhat critical of his approach. Not only did the article provide a significant boost to my self-confidence, but the subject matter laid the groundwork for almost two decades of research. I have been exploring various themes related to abstract concepts and what they reveal about how the brain encodes word meaning ever since. Several articles and a book were to follow.

I haven’t been in the same room with Larry since graduate school. During the Covid-19 pandemic, though, I was able to interact with him in several virtual forums. Remarkably, he has lost none of his creativity or verve. He continues to inspire me with new ideas and to show patience when I express my heterodox views.

I realize that there are many contributors to this celebration of Larry’s career who have a deeper personal connection to him than I do. However, I could not pass up the opportunity to show my gratitude to Larry for the influence that he has had on me as a teacher, a researcher, and a colleague. Thanks, Larry!

Author

  • Guy Dove

    Guy Dove is a philosophy professor at the University of Louisville. He is interested in how the mind works and believes that philosophical accounts of the mental should be informed by findings from anthropology, cognitive science, linguistics, neuroscience, psychology, and related fields. His research falls under the category of philosophy of psychology, broadly construed, and contains both philosophical and empirical elements.

    View all posts Professor

The Psychonomic Society (Society) is providing information in the Featured Content section of its website as a benefit and service in furtherance of the Society’s nonprofit and tax-exempt status. The Society does not exert editorial control over such materials, and any opinions expressed in the Featured Content articles are solely those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the Society. The Society does not guarantee the accuracy of the content contained in the Featured Content portion of the website and specifically disclaims any and all liability for any claims or damages that result from reliance on such content by third parties.

You may also like

1 Comment

  1. Guy, your interest in contributing to this event touches me deeply, and I am truly grateful for your kind words. It’s humbling to hear how those early days in Chicago influenced your career, especially since, as you mentioned, our interactions were relatively minimal. I remember those courses and seminars fondly, and it means a lot to know that they contributed to shaping your path.

    Your research on abstract concepts and your critiques of grounded cognition have been thoughtful, incisive, and provocative. Science no doubt moves forward through open dialogue and constructive challenges, and your work stands as a testament to this. I’ve greatly admired and appreciated the class, respect, and openness you’ve shown in these discussions. Thank you.

    It’s also been a pleasure to see how your work has evolved over the years and the many contributions it continues to make. I value the perspective you bring to the nature of cognition and abstract concepts. I’m glad we’ve had this chance to connect, and I look forward to more opportunities for interaction in the future. I hear that you’re giving presentations at memory conferences these days with David, so maybe we can all meet up at something like this one of these days.